mercoledì 23 febbraio 2011
F18 Worlds 2011 at Hungary: Official website online
F18: Nacra Infusion MKII
domenica 6 febbraio 2011
AC45 action video
http://www.sailkarma.com/feeds/posts/default?alt=rss
Hobie 16: Onboard video
AC45 Sail test II: 25knots
AC45 Testing: Helmet time
Google SEO Correlation Analysis
I have never been a huge fan of correlation analysis. The reason being is that how things behave in aggregate may not have anything to do with how they would behave in your market for your keywords on your website.Harmful High Quality Links?
A fairly new website was ranked amazingly quickly on Google.com for a highly competitive keyword. It wasn't on the first page, but ranked about #20 for a keyword that is probably one of the 100 most profitable keywords online (presuming you could get to a #1 ranking above a billion Dollar corporation). The site did a promotion that was particularly well received by bloggers and a few bigger websites in the UK press and at first rankings improved everywhere. Then one day while looking at its rankings using rank checker I saw the site simply fell off the map. It was nowhere. I then jumped into web analytics and saw search traffic was up. What happened was Google took the site as being from the UK, so its rankings went to page 1 in the UK while the site disappeared from the global results. In aggregate we know that more links are better & links from high trusted domains are always worth getting. And yet in the above situation the site was set back by great links. Of course we can set the geographic market inside Google Webmaster Tools to the United States, but how long will it take Google to respond? How many other local signals will be fixed to pull the site out of the UK?
Over time those links will be a net positive for the site, but it still needs to develop more US signals. And beyond those sort of weird things (like links actually hurting your site) the algorithms can look for other signals to push into geotargeting. Things like Twitter mentions, where things are searched for, how language is used on your website, and perhaps even your site's audience composition may influence localization. What is worse about some of these other signals is that they may mirror media coverage. If you get coverage in The Guardian a lot of people from the UK will see it, and so you might get a lot of Tweets mentioning your website that are from the UK as well. In such a way, many of the signals can be self-reinforcing even when incorrect.
Measuring The Wrong Thing
Another area where correlation analysis falls short is when one page ranks based on the criteria earned by another. Such signal bleeding means that if you are looking at things in aggregate you are often analyzing data which is irrelevant.
Sampling Bias
Correlation analysis also has an issue of sampling bias. People tend to stick with defaults until they learn enough to change. Unfortunately most CMS tools are set up in sub-optimal ways. If you look at the top ranked results some of the sub-optimal set ups will be over-represented in the "what works" category simply because most websites are somewhat broken. The web is a fuzz test.
Of course the opposite of the above is also true: some of the best strategies remain hidden in plain sight simply due to sheer numbers of people doing x poorly.
Analyzing Data Pairs Rather Than Individual Signals
Another way signals have blurred is how Google uses page titles in the search results. That generally used to be just the page title. But more recently they started mixing in
- using an on-page heading rather than the page title (when they feel the on-page heading is more relevant)
- adding link anchor text into the title (in some cases)
- adding the homepage page's title at the end of sub-pages (when sub-page page titles are short)
As Google adds more signals & changes how they account signals it makes analyzing what they are doing much harder. You not only need to understand how the signals are used, but how they interact in pairs or groups. When Google uses the H1 heading on a page to display in the search results are they still putting a lot of weight on the page title? Does the weighting on the H1 change depending on if Google is displaying it or not?
Analysis is Still Valuable, but...
I am not saying that analysis is a waste of time, but rather that when you do it lots of do's and don'ts become far less concrete. The fact is that there are always edge cases that disprove any rule of thumb. Rather than looking for general rules one needs to balance things like:
- risk vs reward
- yield vs effort
- focus vs diversity
- investment vs opportunity cost
First Mover Advantage
Along the same lines, any given snapshot of search is nowhere near as interesting as understanding historical trends and big shifts. If you are one of the first people to notice something there is far more profit potential than being late to the party. Every easily discernible signal Google creates eventually gets priced close to (or sometimes above) true market value. Whereas if you are one of the first people to highlight a change you will often be called ignorant for doing so. :D
Consensus is the opposite of opportunity.
When you do correlation analysis you are finding out when the market has conformed to what Google trusts & desires. Exact match domains were not well ranked across a wide array of keywords until after Google started putting more weight on them & people realized it. But if there is significant weight on them today & their prices are sky high then knowing that they carry some weight might not be a real profit potential in your market. It might even be a distraction or a dead end. Imagine being the person who bets (literally) a million Dollars that Google will place weight on poker.org only to find out that Google changes their algorithmic approach & weighting, or makes a special exception just for your site (as they can & have done). That day would require some tequila.
As a marketing approach becomes more mainstream then not only do the cost rise, but so does the risk of change. As people complain about domain names (or any other signal or technique) it makes Google more likely to act to curb the trend and/or lower it's weighting & value. To see an extreme version of such, consider that the past year has seen lots of complaints about content farms. A beautiful quote:
Searching Google is now like asking a question in a crowded flea market of hungry, desperate, sleazy salesmen who all claim to have the answer to every question you ask.
And so Google promises action. Don't make Google look stupid!
History Holds the Key for Success
The only way to profitably predict the future is to accurately understand history.
Categories: seo tips
- "Our ignorance of history makes us libel our own times. People have always been like this." - Gustave Flaubert
- "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce." - Karl Marx
- "We are the prisoners of history. Or are we?" - Robert Penn Warren, Segregation
mercoledì 5 gennaio 2011
Volvo Cup, pubblicati i calendari
Volvo Cup � Torino � Sono stati resi noti i calendari della stagione Volvo Cup 2011, evento che racchiude le classi Melges 24, D-One, Laser SB3 e Optimist.Gli appuntamenti clou della stagione saranno quelli con i vari Campionati Nazionali. Per i Laser SB3 il palcoscenico sar� quello di Alghero (14-16 ottobre). Ben due dei main event, invece, si svolgeranno in quel di Scarlino, dove i Melges 24 lotteranno per il titolo italiano tra l�8 e il 10 aprile, seguiti dai D-One (16-18 settembre).
Imperdibile, visto il successo della prima edizione, disputata a Valencia alcuni mesi fa, la Gold Cup del singolo ad alte prestazioni disegnato da Luca Devoti. Teatro della manifestazione saranno le acque di Riva del Garda, dove la battaglia si infiammer� tra il 28 e il 31 luglio.
Di seguito il calendario completo della Volvo Cup 2011:
Marzo
5-6, Numana, Laser SB3
5-6, Alassio, Optimist
11-13, Sanremo, Melges 24Aprile
2-3, Numana, Laser SB3
8-10, Scarlino, Melges 24 (Italiano)
15-17, Alassio, D-OneMaggio
6-8, Numana, Melges 24
14-15, Scarlino, Optimist
13-15, Bracciano, D-OneGiugno
3-5, Porto Rotondo, Melges 24
10-12, Cattolica, D-One
18-19, Cattolica, Optimist
25-26, Riva del Garda, Laser SB3Luglio
7-10, Riva del Garda, Melges 24
23-24, Riva del Garda, Laser SB3
28-31, Riva del Garda, D-One (Gold Cup)Settembre
16-18, Scarlino, D-One (Italiano)
24-25, Alghero, Laser SB3Ottobre
1-2, Trieste, Optimist
14-16, Laser SB3 (Italiano)
Video promo della 34th America�s Cup a San Francisco
Sicuramente d�effetto, musica incalzante ed immagini spettacolari, il solo problema � che hanno messo una sacco di barche a regatare insieme quasi facendo a sportellate. Per carit� non � che debba per forza essere fedele fedele, ma quando una delle critiche maggiori che vengono mosse sulla nuova classe � quella di non essere adatta al Match Race un occhio ai dettagli non farebbe male.Via | XSRacing
Video promo della 34th America�s Cup a San Francisco � stato pubblicato su yachtandsail alle 12:21 di mercoled� 05 gennaio 2011.